Adapted from: holodomorinfo.com. The information at that site has been reproduced here, with only minor changes to the text.
The myth of the Pogrom
The Jewish Bolshevik regime had begun murdering their way through ethnic Europeans as early as the 1920’s. Initially, these crimes were concealed behind the Jewish Bolshevik construct of the ‘Soviet Union’, but with a Jewish victory in 1945, a new paradigm was concocted, with the German Nation as the scapegoat. The source of the Big Lie can be traced back to the Jewish architect of ethnic European Genocide, Vladimir Lenin, who pronounced that “a lie told often enough becomes the truth”. While the Jewish Bolshevik genocide of ethnic Europeans has been concealed for the 70 years since WWII, ethnic Europe has been saturated with propaganda regarding a Jewish ‘Holocaust’.
Ethnic European peoples are particularly susceptible to Jewish propaganda, with their nations so insular, as opposed to the international nature of the Jewish tribe. Ethnic Europeans of the German Nation are not united with ethnic Europeans of the Russian Nation; consequently, international information becomes limited to that which the Jewish tribe allows to filter through their network. A specific example of networking between Jewish cells occurred during WWI. Jewish Zionist Leo Motzkin presided over the Copenhagen office of the Zionist organization, and operated as liaison between Zionist organizations in all other European nations. Trust is also a significant issue. The ethnic European of a number of nations appears capable of trusting implicitly that their own racial brethren are perpetrating horrendous atrocities; yet, will self-censor the crimes and atrocities that another race has perpetrated against their own. Trust between fraternal nations is at its lowest ebb during territorial instability when pseudo-patriotism encourages ethnic Europeans to paint their racial brethren as a nation of beasts. Jewish propaganda operates at a premium during war when there is most unrest. It feeds and maintains ethnic division, an example of which is ‘Holocaust’ propaganda that primarily demonises the German nation, and in a wider context, paralyses ethnic Europe with false guilt, allowing Jewish interests priority throughout ethnic European territory.
Curiously, other occasions in European history have been most ‘opportune’ for Jewish interests. In the late 19th-century, Russia was plagued by riots, alleged by Jewish voices to be ‘anti-Jewish’ in nature, and classified by Jewish historians as ‘genocidal pogroms’. These riots had considerable demographic implications for the rest of ethnic Europe and European America for at least 80% of Jews in the West are descendants of Jewish immigrants from Russia and its environs during the period 1880–1910. Commissioned to write propaganda alleging so-called ‘pogroms’ against Jews [were happening] in Russia, it was the Jewish leader of the World Zionist Congress and numerous other Jewish Zionist organizations across Europe, Leo Motzkin, that spearheaded a campaign against ethnic White Russians. Joined by Franz Oppenheimer and Adolf Friedemann, he invented a ‘German Committee for Freeing of Russian Jews’, apparently condoned by the German Government of the time, which attests to the Jewish ability to splinter relationships between fraternal nations. Also intriguing is that Jewish sources openly discouraged historical enquiry by non-Jewish historians into the subject of alleged ‘pogroms’ in Russia. For example, when Ukrainian historians exposed evidence proving that contemporary media reports of Jewish casualties in that nation were wildly exaggerated, the Jewish genealogy website, ‘JewishGen’, responded by stating: “We believe that [these facts] are more than irrelevant because it redirects public attention from the major topic: the genocidal essence of pogroms.” Yet, of the genocide by Jewish Bolsheviks of 16.5 million ethnic Europeans in Ukraine, there still remains hardly a murmur.
In 1881, the ‘Russo-Jewish Committee’ (RJC), an arm of Britain’s Jewish elite, mass-produced a pamphlet entitled “The Persecution of the Jews in Russia” – the 1899 edition of which included a lengthy letter written to the London Times by Nathan Joseph, Secretary of the RJC, dated November 5th, 1890, claiming that, in the present circumstances, “hundreds of thousands [of Jews] could be exterminated” – and began disseminating it through the press, the churches, and numerous other channels. By 1899, it was embellished, and published as a short book, and today, digitized copies are freely available online. By the early 20th century, the pamphlet had even spawned a four-page journal called “Darkest Russia – A Weekly Record of the Struggle for Freedom”, ensuring that the average [ethnic Briton] did not go long without being reminded of the ‘horrors’ facing [Jews in Russia]. The fact that these publications were mass-produced should provide an indication as to their purpose: it is clear that these publications represented one of the most ambitious propaganda campaigns in Jewish history, and combined with similar efforts in the United States, they were aimed at gaining the attention of Western nations and ensuring the primacy of the ‘Jewish … story.’
Implicit in this was not only a desire to provoke anti-Russian attitudes, but also copious amounts of sympathy for the victimized Jews — sympathy necessary to ensure that mass Jewish chain migration to the West went on untroubled and unhindered by nativists.” A complete transposition of the historical relations between White Russian and Jew, the propaganda contended that the Jews of Eastern Europe had been oppressed for centuries – their whole lives “hampered, from cradle to grave, by restrictive laws.” They claimed that White Russians had an unwritten law “that no Russian Jew shall earn a living,” even though, according to the Russo-Jewish Committee, Jews in Russia wanted nothing more than to participate in Russian society. The Jewish narrative also contended that the ‘pogroms’ were genocidal in nature and perpetrated by groups seeking the extermination of the Jews.
Yet, the most horrific of the charges laid against the Russian Empire was that they had committed the most fiendish atrocities on the most enormous scale. Jews had allegedly been murdered ruthlessly, infants dashed on the stones or roasted alive in their own homes. A common theme in most contemporary atrocity stories was the brutal rape of Jewish women, with most reports including mention of breasts being hacked off. The similarity between such atrocities and those concocted by ‘Holocaust survivors’ cannot be denied; furthermore, it was Jewish Bolsheviks that instigated a horrific cycle of crucifixions, scalpings and other bestial tortures against ethnic Europeans, in which eyes were poked out, tongues cut off, and victims buried alive. Indeed, letters home from German soldiers attest to Jewish Bolshevik brutality.
NCO K. Suffner, Military Post Number 08 070, to his work mates:
“… The Bolshevists and Jews bestially murdered 12,000 Germans and Ukrainians. I saw pregnant women hanging by their feet in the GPU’s prison. They had slit the noses, ears, eyes, fingers, hands and arms and legs of other women. Some even had their hearts cut out. 300 orphans between the ages of 2 and 17 had been nailed to the wall and butchered. After they were done with the torture, they threw the people, most of whom were still alive, into a 3 meter deep pile in the basement, doused them with gasoline, and lit them on fire. It was terrible! We could not believe that shave suffered if Bolshevism had reached us. The complainers and know-it-alls that we still have in the Reich should see this. Then they would know what pure Bolshevism looks like. They would fall to their knees and thank the Führer for saving Germany from such things. I and many other German soldiers have seen this. We all thank the Führer that he let us see the Bolshevist “paradise.” We swear to extirpate this plague, root and branch.”
Soldier Fred Fallnbigl to his Parents in Salzburg, 17.7.41:
“… a bit more from the Soviet Paradise. I’ll especially tell you about things that happened in Lemberg-Tarnopol and Tromborla. Tromborla is due south of Tarnopol. I saw the prisons in Lemberg, and saw things that struck me deeply. There were men with their ears and noses cut off, etc. They had nailed children alive by their hands and feet to the wall, butchering them. The blood was ankle deep. It didn’t make any difference if they were alive or dead. They doused the piles of bodies with gasoline and set them on fire … I always think how fortunate we are that this scourge of humanity never made it to our country. I don’t think that even years of preparation would make Germans capable of such atrocities.”
Given the evidence of long-term murderous Jewish Bolshevik atrocities against ethnic Europeans and the failing construct that is the ‘Holocaust’, Jewish claims of horrific brutality by white Russia begins to sound decidedly hollow. Even more so when one discovers that the 1881 assassination of Tsar Alexander II set into motion a Jewish emancipation in Russia. He made education fully open to Jews, Jews could sit on the juries of Russian courts, and efforts to change the economic profile of Jews were relaxed. However, while the Jews in Russia took advantage, beginning to swamp higher education establishments, they stubbornly persisted in the unproductive trades, continued in their antipathy to Russian culture, and refused to make any meaningful contribution to Russian society. In Odessa, there were reports that in school after school, Jews were “driving Christians from the school benches,” and “filling up the schools.” Jewish propaganda proposed that when the riots began, the government was “not altogether sorry to let the excitement of the people vent itself on the Jews.” However, John Doyle Klier, in his 2005 work, “Russians, Jews, and the Pogroms of 1881–2”, stated that “contemporary research has dispelled the myth that Russian officials were responsible for instigating, permitting, or approving the pogroms.”
It was largely Klier’s work in the late 1980s which began to truly shed light on the origins of Russian-Jewish relations prior to 1914. Jews overwhelmingly “served in a variety of middleman roles.” In many cities, “the Jewish mercantile element was numerically superior to the [White Russian] Christian,” and there was a gradual move towards the re-acquisition of the liquor trade. According to Klier, by 1830, Jews in Belarus were found to be “totally dominating trade”, which closely reflects the Jewish fuel-monopolies of Wittgenstein and Rothschild, occurring in Central Europe during the same period, and are too coincidental not to be a coordinated requisition of ethnic European wealth. A large number of wealthy Jews were also found to have funded some of the rebels in the nationalist revolt of Poles in 1863, casting fresh doubts on Jewish loyalty to Russia. Breaking out at a moment when general quiet prevailed in Europe, there was a public outcry in support of the Poles. Again, this provides the necessary conditions for the transmission of Jewish propaganda, as periods of inter-ethnic strife are highly conducive for demonization of a nation to the outside world. It also mirrors the Jewish financing of ‘revolution’ in Europe throughout history.
Meanwhile, with the close of WWII, Jewish ‘citizens’ in Berlin daubed the door frames with lamb’s blood so the Jewish Bolshevik Red army would ‘Passover‘ to rape and murder only ethnic Germans. The Jewish case against ethnic Europe is so contrived, that were it not so genocidal, it would be comic. What is patently clear is that Jewish historians greatly exaggerated the death toll during periods of rioting in Russia. People may well have died, but, in general, Jews were not specifically targeted. Reports of Jewish rape victims and violent atrocities against Jews are a fiction. One must reiterate that, with evidence of long-term murderous Jewish Bolshevik atrocities against ethnic Europeans, and the failing construct that is the ‘Holocaust’, Jewish claims of horrific brutality by white Russia is as hollow as their 70-year big lie.