Adapted from: HolomodorInfo.com. There have been only minor alterations made to the original text. This essay is an introduction about the Three Holodomor Genocides. These were:
Out of these, the 1932-1933 Holodomor Genocide is the best-known one.
The Three Holodomor Genocides
The October Revolution was not what you call in America the “Russian Revolution.” It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be understated. Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators.” – Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1918-2008), Nobel-Prize-winning novelist, historian and victim of Jewish Bolshevism (Marxism).
This leech implemented a psychology that was meant to instigate resistance from indigenous Europeans; thus, providing a ‘plausible excuse’ for the Jewish Bolshevik authorities to use force against the native population. The Tambov massacre had all the characteristics of a dry run, in which the Bolshevik Red Army first exercised all its dreadful force against the civilian population, revealing that Lenin had discovered a powerful weapon against the ethnic European people, which is evidenced by the mass murders known as the Holodomor Genocides, occurring in 1921-22, 1932-33 and 1946-47.
“From the end of June 1921 until apparently the fall (autumn) of 1921”, chemical weapons, developed and weaponized by Jewish chemist Fritz Haber during WWI, were used by direct order of the Communist Party (Bolsheviks) and Red Army leadership. Order No. 171, dated 11th June 1921 and signed by Vladimir Ovseenko, shows clearly the sorts of methods used to “pacify” Tambov Province. It stipulated:
In village after village, the women and elderly were savagely beaten, the women raped, then, along with the children, removed to concentration camps. A prelude to the Gulag, conditions in these camps were intolerable: typhus and cholera were endemic, and the half-naked prisoners lacked even basic requirements. A conservative estimate states that at least 50,000 were interned, with the mortality rate in the camps at least 20 percent a month. Ovseenko also signed an order, dated 12th June 1921, concerning the resistance fighters, stipulating that:
“The forests where the bandits are hiding are to be cleared by the use of poison gas. This must be carefully calculated, so that the layer of gas penetrates the forests and kills everyone hiding there.”
On the 19th October, Lenin wrote to Felix Dzerzhinsky, saying “It is vital that this movement (Tambov) be crushed as swiftly as possible in the most exemplary fashion: we must be more energetic than this.” Thus, hunger became the most powerful weapon imaginable, as areas of high grain seizure suffered most horrifically due to their resistance.
A horrific cycle of crucifixions, scalpings and other “bestial tortures” ensued. Shootings by the Jewish Cheka where common place; even children caught eating confiscated grain were shot as ‘traitors’ to the Bolshevik state, and there were those Cheka who cut open their victim’s stomach, pulled out a length of small intestine, nailed it to a telegraph pole, and with a whip, forced the victim to run circles around the pole until the whole intestine became unravelled.
That same year, Walter Duranty, an Anglo-American journalist who served as the Moscow Bureau Chief of The New York Times, moved to Lenin’s Soviet construct, directly coinciding with the beginning of the first Holodomor and forced famine in Russia. The fact that he was the only reporter, allowed to move around Russia unaccompanied, is, in itself, damming. In 1932, Duranty won a Pulitzer Prize for a series of reports made to the leading Jewish newspaper, The New York Times, about the so-called ‘Soviet Union’. [Because of the] flagrant lies, there was sharp criticism, and calls to The New York Times, who had submitted Duranty’s work for the prize, to revoke his Pulitzer.
Indeed, Duranty [had] denounced reports of [a] famine in The New York Times on 31st March 1933, and, in particular, he attacked Gareth Jones, a British journalist who had witnessed the horror in Ukraine and issued a widely published press release about it two days earlier in Berlin. Journalist Malcolm Muggeridge has stated many times that he believed the Bolsheviks had some kind of hold over Duranty, whilst Journalist Joseph Alsop claimed that “Duranty was a great KGB agent and lying like a trooper.” His marriage following the first Holodomor to Jane Cheron, a Jewess, that he himself characterised as having “the nose and mouth [that] suggested more than a trace of Semitic blood”, further signifies Duranty’s Jewish fixation.
Lenin even outlined the need for famine by stating “destroying the peasant economy and driving the peasant from the country to the town, the famine creates a proletariat…”, at which point he exposed the real purpose for instigating the Jewish Bolshevik famine. “It is precisely now, and only now, when, in the starving regions, people are eating human flesh, and hundreds, if not thousands, of corpses are littering the roads, that we can (and therefore, must) carry out the confiscation of church valuables with the most savage and merciless energy, not stopping (short of) crushing any resistance.” He continued, ”The greater the number of representatives of the reactionary clergy and reactionary bourgeoisie we succeed in executing for this reason, the better”.
Violent torture and confiscation of food proved such an effective method of crushing Tambov that the cycle was repeated in the Ukraine in areas resisting occupation by Jewish Bolshevism. It is a matter of record that international relief organizations were forbidden to operate in Ukraine until January 1922, confirming that the Jewish Bolshevik authorities had no wish to alleviate the suffering they had inflicted until they were quite sure that the population had been ‘pacified’. Meanwhile, the Russian populace was in the grip of an equally destructive Bolshevik-engineered famine, and it is estimated that across both famines, as many as 5 million ethnic Europeans were murdered.
By November 1929, Matvei Berman, the son of a Jewish brickyard owner, had developed the Gulag system of concentration camps that defined Lenin’s “most cruel revolutionary terror”, and in 1930, became deputy chief. Berman became head of the Gulag on June 9th, 1932, taking over from Lazar Kogan, the son of a wealthy Jewish merchant, and a high ranking Cheka NKVD functionary, who had been chief from 1930, and became deputy chief from 1932-1936. Berman remained until August 17th, 1937, and in 1935, by his own count, he was in charge of over 740,000 prisoners in the Gulag concentration camp system. Yet, it is Naftaly Frenkel, a Jewish businessman and member of the Cheka, who is best known for his role in the organisation of work in the Gulag, starting with the concentration camps of the Solovetsky Islands, recognised as one of the earliest sites of the Gulag.
Frenkel personally invented the notorious you-eat-as-you-work system, also known as the nourishment scale. Like the larger scale Holodomor genocides – murder by starvation – this destroyed weaker prisoners in weeks, and induced a phenomenal death toll, greatly supporting Lenin’s “bloody war of extermination”.
Nikita Khrushchev also played a very significant role in the Holodomor genocide of 1932-33, in which as many as 10 million ethnic Europeans were murdered. On the basis of performances in that Bolshevik-engineered famine in 1934, he was promoted to a full member of the Communist Party of the Soviet construct.
What proceeds is part of a witness statement made at the extensive hearing on the role and responsibility of Nikita S. Khrushchev in Stalin’s inhuman and barbarous persecution of the Ukrainian people, held by the House Committee on Un-American Activities on September 9th-11th, 1959, 16 days prior to Khrushchev’s capped 12 day visit to America. “To those members of the Ukrainian resistance movement who were caught, as well as their families, the NKVD and KGB applied the following measures of terror:
Also, water for public use was poisoned. Cigarettes and chocolates were tampered with in this manner. After consuming them, people became sick.” Following this, the witness, a Mr Mykola Lebed, confirmed that “These methods were applied [by Communists] in order to terrorize the population of Ukraine and depress its will to resist the regime”, and were directed by Khrushchev, as he was regional leader of the Ukraine at the time.
Khrushchev was the short bald dictator with the large rubbery lips, who, while pounding his shoe on the podium at the United Nations (UN), shouted, “we will bury you.” There is no doubt that in order to become a full member of the Central Committee, Khrushchev had to prove to the Jewish Bolshevik regime that he was worthy of this promotion. This he did by executing the policy of forced famine in the Ukraine.
Furthermore, there was the usual failure to mention the 1921-22 or 1946-47 genocides, even though Kaganovich was a full member of the 13th, 15th, 16th, 17th, 18th Orgburo or Organizational Bureau, the department responsible for all assignments within the apparatus of the Communist Party, meaning that he was in office from April 3rd 1922 – March 18th 1946.
Clearly, Khrushchev’s role in the second Holodomor was concealed, for he had a further nefarious task to perform for the Jewish Bolshevik agenda. In 1959, the ‘terrible Swedish Jew’ president Dwight D. Eisenhower invited him to America. No president of America had ever asked a Bolshevik premier to visit the United States before, and curiously, it was journalist Alistair Cooke that presents some insight: “Not a tour of America to see what America is about but a free campaign tour provided by the state department, an incomparable advertisement at the American expense of the glories of communism and the coming violent decline of the western world.”
At the height of American fears of Communism, originating not with her internal security (FBI), but prompted by revelations of Joe McCarthy, Bolshevik insurgents did indeed threaten. A luncheon at the Hollywood Café de Paris was arranged, and while Bing Crosby, Ward Bond, Adolphe Menjou and Ronald Reagan turned down their invitations as a protest against Khrushchev, some, particularly Jewish stars, were urged by comrades to stay home because of their political affiliations.
Many had been investigated by the House Committee for un-American activities, and were, therefore, considered too radical to dine with a communist dictator. Indeed, with patriots rejecting the Bolshevik Khrushchev out of hand, it had all the hallmarks of a Comintern assembly, openly displayed on American soil.
That same year, 1959, Ukrainian Nationalist, Jew-wise and staunch anti-Bolshevik Stepan Bandera was assassinated in Munich by the KGB. A CIA agent stated that “Bandera is by nature a political intransigent … opposed to all political organizations in the emigration which favour a representative form of government in the Ukraine, as opposed to a mono-party, OUN/Bandera regime”. This sheds light on Bandera’s liquidation.
Post-WWII OUN(B) groups had been infiltrated or crushed by Jewish Bolsheviks, working to condemn Bandera and true Nationalism. Equally, according to the ‘West’, the only acceptable form of government was representative democracy, easily corrupted or controlled by those same Jewish Bolsheviks.
In this atmosphere, Bandera would clearly have been well aware of the threat of assassination, if not from the Bolshevik KGB, from an agent from anyone of the so-called ‘democratic’ governments, opposing a form of government free from Jewish Bolshevik corruption and control. Indeed, the violent Jewish Bolshevik seizure of Russia, and subsequently, European lands, and this alien ideology’s murderous genocides went largely, or perhaps, deliberately, unnoticed by such an easily controlled form of government (democracy).
In 1946, the Vinnytsya region had been reduced to half the size; yet, the same, if not more, grain was seized, proving without a doubt the Bolshevik authorities’ intention to again induce famine in the region. The situation in the Kyiv region was just as catastrophic. By October 1947, grain seizures had reached murderous levels, causing the deaths by starvation of hundreds of thousands of the European farming population.
Thus, the correspondence of areas of resistance to the Bolshevik regime with high grain seizure and great suffering is empirical evidence of the deliberate creation for Europeans of conditions that were incompatible with life. Indeed the concept of ‘genocide‘, meaning the destruction of one distinct genome by another, was conceived by the Jewish lawyer Raphael Lemkin, and for which, the convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide, adopted on 9th December 1948, would apply.
Nevertheless, the victims of the Holodomor Genocides are yet to see justice, and the atrocities committed against over 60 million ethnic Europeans go unpunished. “Without Jews, there would never have been Bolshevism. For a Jew, nothing is more insulting than the truth. THE BLOODTHIRSTY JEWISH TERRORISTS HAVE MURDERED SIXTY SIX MILLION in Russia from 1918 to 1957.” ~ Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Nobel Peace Prize Winner and Patriot.
However, most unspeakable must surely be the sickening knowledge that, as Jewry accused and hung innocent German soldiers during the Nuremberg Trials, the Jewish Bolsheviks were committing the atrocities of the 1946-7 Holodomor. It was Lenin who said “tell a lie big enough and often enough it becomes the truth”. Perhaps that is why an ‘iron curtain’ lies across the Jewish tribe, while the European race is condemned for Jewish crimes.
Over the last three decades, Ukrainians in Canada and Ukraine have honoured the many millions of Europeans murdered in the Holodomor Genocides. Yet, it is vital to note that the tribe that instigated these horrific crimes are now taking a leading role in the campaign to recognise the offence. Indeed, the November 2015 commemoration in Canada began with the annual lecture given by Jewish Yale University professor Timothy Snyder, the author of books, including “Bloodlands: Europe between Hitler and Stalin”. This, in itself, should raise alarm bells, particularly when attention is drawn to the fact that their operation confines the crime to 1932-33.
There are multiple reasons for this: by taking a leading role, the Jew can be less graphic in the portrayal of the story – that the title of the annual lecture is reduced to merely ‘Ukrainian Famine’ highlights this; the effect of the crime is dampened by comparisons with the Jewish ‘Holocaust construct’, and with this crushed is the most disturbing element, the Jewish annihilation of Europeans. Overall, this is a Jewish damage-limitation exercise, and therefore, it is necessary to restrict the narrative to conceal the Jewish nature and origin of the Holodomor Genocides.
Given the obvious fact that Communism is a Jewish ideology invented by Karl Marx, and economically manifested by the Jewish Bolshevik Vladimir Lenin, it is only logical that the Jewish tribe would wish to conceal their crimes behind the façade of a supposed gentile Stalin (Lenin’s ethnic identity was not confirmed until 1991), thus confining the Holodomor Genocides to 1932-33. Consequently, seminar leaders are there to restrict and confine questioning, and this site advises those that attend these meetings that they have a duty and obligation to expose the wider truth.