Free speech suppression is very dangerous. Free speech suppression was one of the first steps in instigating Red Terror in the USSR.
One could not talk about the cabalistic nature of the Jews in the USSR. Therefore, the cabalism grew unchecked and consumed around 60 million Gentiles.
Without the right to communicate our concerns about the cabalism, evidence of the existence of which is everywhere, Gentiles are placed in danger. Their lives are at risk. It’s the same thing with respect to the Mafia. Jews trying to make it illegal to criticize the cabalism of the Jews is the same as the mafia attempting to make it illegal for people to criticize the Mafia and the cabalism of the Mafia.
Failure to voice these concerns can lead to another Holocaust – no, not the fake one that the Cabal are trying to promote everywhere – their tentacles have even reached Australian schools – but the real one, the one done by the Jews on the Gentiles: https://papermacheworld.wordpress.com/debunking-the-holocaust-iii/
It’s absurd. The criminals should not be the ones making the laws. It shows how heavily the UK is compromised that this sort of persecution of gentiles is allowed to go on.
Jews are not the victims by far – they are the oppressors and persecutors. It’s not in the interests of the gentiles for any group within their society, Masons, Jews, Mafia, to get exceptional treatment. They are a secret society. They operate as thus. And the gentiles outside of those groups have the ability to discuss them in public. What some call “whipping up hatred for an ethnic group” others call “defensive criticism”.
How else can people warn each other of the dangers of these secret societies and their cabalism if their speech is suppressed?
Even JEWS themselves warn about Jewish cabalism: see the post about Sayanim. Why would Jews lie about this subject? Jacob Cohen isn’t the only one speaking about the cabalism of Jews – there is ex-Mossad agent Viktor Ostrovsky himself. There are the two members of the Menuhin family, Moshe and Gerard.
Anyway, it doesn’t matter whether there are or are not Jewish persons who speak about the phenomenon of cabalism of the Jews, as a matter of principle, all discussions of ethnic groups, religious groups, racial groups, anything, should be allowed. The nations of the world must not fall into becoming nanny states. People who come of age are adults and should be treated like thus. The alternative is a slow slide to USSR style existence – one that was marked by terror of the government, a clamp down on free speech.
As the illustration by the talented and wise smoloko says, the hate speech laws and holocaust denial laws are laws that prevent gentiles from protecting themselves against the Jews. They do not protect Jews themselves. Jews have historically not been the victims. They have been the aggressors and the warmongers.
I take exception to the cringing tone of the article below. It acts apologetically toward the Jews. It keeps stressing that the rise in antisemitism that the Jewish person claims is happening is non-existent. A rise in “antisemitism” is a good thing and should not be apologized for. A rise in Defensive Antisemitism means that the machinations of Zionists and other cabalistic Jews do not go unchecked. It means people are learning about the activities and secrets of this secretive anti-gentile cabal and are taking steps to protect themselves, armed with this information. Being informed is the best protection.
Therefore, the thrust of the article, that there is no rise in anti-semitism and that Jez Turner did not break the law, seems misplaced. The article should focus on why should there be such an anti-freedom law in the first place. It should talk about the rights of and protections for gentiles.
Being part of the cabal is a choice. Many ethnic Jews have been able to tear themselves away from this cabal and have even exposed the inner workings of it.
Not enough though. Such clamp downs on free speech discourage Jews from getting out of this cabal. The cabal thrives on these sorts of laws that punish truth-telling. The cabal gets stronger with the enactment of these laws. See the USSR where antisemitism, that is criticizing the Jews, was a crime punishable by death, and it was.
A society that cannot protect itself from an ethnic mafia by speaking about its existence and criticizing is in extreme danger.
A free society gives members of the cabal the freedom to criticize back or defend their group if they want to.
The truth needs no censorship. It needs the opposite. Only those who have something to hide ask for censorship.
Ethnic Jews themselves suffer from the cabal’s actions. Read about how Gerard Menuhin was persecuted by some members of the cabal when he spoke up about the September 11 attacks being suspicious.
What gives this cabal the right to be free from criticism? Are they gods that all members of society must obey? Are we living in the Dark Ages in Europe when belief in Christ was mandatory? Are we living in Saudi Arabia where we are not allowed to criticize certain things in public?
A video is posted below of a speech made by Jez Turner. Please watch. It is about nationalists.
The Trial of Jez Turner: A Jewish Witch Hunt
August 7, 2017 Other Writers
By ANDREW JOYCE, PhD
Abridged by Lasha Darkmoon from an article in The Occidental Observer, with additional notes and comments by LD.
(A recent speech given by Jez Turner at the London Forum follows in a 27-minute video)
JEZ TURNER, British patriot and founder of the London Forum
. . . is to go on trial for “incitement to racial hatred” against Jews, despite having been given a clean bill of health several times by Britain’s Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). How is it possible that a man who has committed no crimes, according to Britain’s top lawyers, should be hauled before a court for his non-existent crimes? Read on to find out.
On July 4th 2015 Jez Turner, along with fellow patriots, staged a static protest in Whitehall, opposite Downing Street, in protest at the development of the Shomrim (see picture above), a Jewish ‘defense’ group that possessed all the trappings of an illegal religious police force. During the protest, it has been alleged that Turner gave a speech in which he stated that:
“all politicians are nothing but a bunch of puppets dancing to a Jewish tune, and the ruling regimes in the West for the last one hundred years have danced to the same tune.”
Turner is also reported as having stated that Jews played an influential role in the French Revolution and both World Wars, before concluding that England was a content and successful nation during the period of the expulsion (1290–1656), and adding that we should “free England from Jewish control.”
Although the initial report to the police was made by the more senior Jewish organization, the Community Security Trust (CST), Gideon Falter, head of the Campaign Against Antisemitism, was the most vocal and ardent pursuer of the case.
The police, in accordance with established process for ‘hate crimes,’ passed footage of the speech to the Crown Prosecution Service’s counterterrorism division. It was here that Falter began to encounter difficulties, and why a further Jewish campaign to hinder free speech in Britain has acquired momentum in the last twelve months. While Leon Brittan’s inclusion of an ‘incitement to racial hatred’ clause in the 1986 Public Order Act was an important hit on free speech, it was not all-encompassing, and it did not come close to making ‘anti-Semitism’ illegal.
LD: Leon Brittan, a descendant of Lithuanian Jews, was a British politician whose original name was Leon Brittanisky. He died in 2015, having worked indefatigably right to the end of his life to promote Jewish interests over the interests of his family’s adopted country.
The Crown Prosecution Service’s policy guidelines on cases involving ‘incitement’ under the 1986 Act clearly state that the language employed by a defendant must have been “threatening, abusive or insulting. These words are given their normal meaning but the courts have ruled that behavior can be annoying, rude or even offensive without necessarily being insulting.”
Moreover, further comment from the CPS has made it clear that the language employed by the defendant must have been “grossly abusive or insulting” or moved beyond reasonable “criticism” of a group, for a prosecution to be valid, since “it is essential in a free, democratic and tolerant society that people are able robustly to exchange views, even when these may cause offence.” At some point in the aftermath of Falter’s report to the authorities, the CPS made the decision that Jez Turner hadn’t said anything illegal and ceased legal action against him.
Five months after the speech, Gideon Falter approached the Chief Crown Prosecutor for London with a view to discovering the charging decision in the case. He was informed by the CPS that Turner was entitled to free speech and hadn’t broken any laws.
Falter then attempted to request a Victim’s Right to Review, a request that was declined on the basis that Turner hadn’t mentioned Falter and therefore Falter couldn’t claim victim status …
< snip >
Video: JT Memorial Meeting 2017: Jez Turner
A transcript of the speech is here.